Arthur Fery vs Daniil Glinka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: In the last six months, Glinka has a slight edge, winning 47.59% of second serve points compared to Fery's 46.86%. Could this marginal advantage affect the match outcome?
• Return Game Stats: Glinka outperforms Fery on opponents' second serve returns, winning 44.33% of the points, whereas Fery wins 42.94%. However, Fery slightly edges Glinka in first serve returns with 25.47% to Glinka's 24.88%.
• Under Pressure: Fery has saved 53.88% of breakpoints, better than Glinka's 51.98%. Does Fery's ability to handle pressure make them more likely to prevail in tight situations?
• Overall Performance: Over the past year, Fery boasts a higher match win percentage of 81.58%, compared to Glinka's 64.52%, suggesting a stronger overall performance.
• Surface Success: Both players excel on indoor hard courts, with Fery having a 71% win rate, notably higher than Glinka's 57% on the same surface.
• Event Level: Fery's experience at higher-level Challenger and ITF events (> $10K) with an 81.82% win rate, contrasts with Glinka's 64.86% in Futures and Satellites ($10K).
• Head-to-Head Record: Fery has secured the only prior encounter against Glinka in straight sets, highlighting their H2H advantage.
• Opponent Quality: Fery has faced tougher opponents, with an average ranking of 359.68 compared to Glinka's 427.71, potentially sharpening Fery's competitive edge.
• Break Point Conversion: Glinka edges ahead with a 29.78% conversion rate over Fery’s 29.06%, which could be a deciding factor during critical moments.
• Deciding Set Performance: Both players are almost equal, with Glinka slightly better at 62%, but with no deciding sets in their H2H.

Editorial Prediction (September 5, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performance trends, Fery seems better equipped in handling pressure situations, with a superior breakpoint save percentage. This skill could prove pivotal in crucial moments of the match.

Moreover, Fery's greater success rate in Challenger and ITF events presents an advantage in terms of experience and facing higher-ranked opponents. This stream of competitive seasoning positions Fery as the more formidable contender in this matchup.

Although Glinka holds slight statistical edges in second serve performance and break point conversion rates, Fery's overall stronger performance, both historically and against higher-quality opponents, suggests a competitive edge.

Considering these insights, and given Fery's prior head-to-head victory over Glinka, Arthur Fery emerges as the likely winner of this forthcoming encounter.